its a gauge thing
I had the brief, although not surprising momentary "realization" this weekend that there's a good reason why I rarely knit garments. Gauge is not my friend (or as Claudia often says, gauge is evil).
I've been dreaming about knitting the cover tank (Lotus Blossom tank) from the last issue of Interweave Knits for a while. I know that this style would look good on me, I got a gorgeous color of bamboo yarn to knit it in, and knowing me and the sleeve issue, I figured that something so relatively sleeveless would be a good choice. (I might point out that, thankfully, IK also posted a charted version of the lace pattern, which you can download from HERE. Having just found this I'll refrain from b*tching about the lack of charts for lace in most magazine patterns.)
For once, I swatched. However, swatches as we all know, lie. Over and over again. I find it impossible to swatch in stockinette to succesfully predict what my gauge will be over a lace pattern. I knit lace in the round differently than stockinette in a flat swatch. But this time, I at least gave it a go.
Mistake #1:
I swatched on wooden needles, assuming that with a slippery feeling yarn like Southwest Trading Bamboo, I'd have to compensate for the slippery yarn. Well, no. I needed slippery needles to compensate for the lack of spring in a plant fiber yarn (this, so far as I can tell, is the only downside to rarely knitting with anything other than wool - I didn't know this ahead of time). So I had to switch to metal needles almost immediately.
Mistake #2:
I assumed that the stated needle size in the pattern was at least moderately accurate. Now, I tend to be a medium to tight knitter, in general. Very tight for socks, moderate for lace. But when starting this pattern, I was knitting very tightly, on Addis. So tightly in fact, that I had trouble moving the stitches around on the needle.
Mistake #3:
I ignored the fact, for several rows, that the lace fabric looked almost nothing like the picture of the finished tank. It was too loose and floppy on the needles to bear any resemblance to the tight, orderly lace stitches shown in the finished garment. Do not, I repeat, do NOT ignore those types of inklings.
Now, I rarely take pictures of my stupid mistakes, and this is no exception. But when I finally got to the point (9 rows x 200 sts in) that I should have been changing to a different needle size, I realized my errors. The embryonic tank was a whopping 4" bigger than it should have been.
I will say one thing, with no disrespect whatsoever intended to the designer and knitter of this pattern, which I adore. If anyone is able to get the stated gauge on the recommended needle size, I'm going to have to assume that they have bionic hands. Because at my tightest knitting gauge, I was way, way off on the recommended needles. Some of this may have to do with the slippery nature of 100% bamboo yarn. Other than that, it is truly inconceivable.
So, I ripped. Viciously and heartlessly, and restarted on needles .5mm smaller than those I had started with originally. And now.... I'm praying. That it works. Because I love the yarn color, love the drape of the yarn, and love the pattern. But I'm not sure I'm willing to go below a 3mm needle to get gauge on a pattern that was supposed to be knit on a 4mm (US6) needle.
Here's the second gestational period of the embryonic tank:
A measly 8 rows in, although I've knitted that +9 rows by now. I still have very little to no idea if the gauge is on yet or not. Obviously my row gauge is going to be off, but I can deal with that. I think.
And in another blow to fiber ennui, I also did a bit of spinning this weekend. I plied up the extrafine merino/silk I had spun a while ago. (This is from Capistrano Fiber Arts Studio/Lori Lawson - no website, bought at The Yarn Tree here in Brooklyn.) Although I often fizzle on the plying, I did okay this time around. Especially when I stopped watching what I was doing and started watching the movie that was on TV. I guess I spin better intuitively than I do when the logical portion of my brain is engaged. The yarn seems well balance, and looked even better after washing and drying:
The color is off, totally. Its more of a burgundy/deepforest-purple color overall. I was too lazy/hot to take a picture in natural sunlight, when I could show off both the true colors as well as the silky shine.[Please note, I shamelessly arranged the yarn for the photo so that the badly spun portions are not visible - full disclosure and all of that.] Tragically, the colors in this yarn look better on my daughter than they do on me. I guess I know what that means - college-bound scarf, I'm afraid.





















